Thomas Cook Essay Example for Free

doubting doubting doubting doubting doubting Thomas fixate EssayIntroductionThomas Cook is the current leader in the UK transport industry. Thomas Cook is a huge organization employing 11,000 people and serving more than than 4 million customers annually. After being acquired by CN Touristic AG in 2000, it was disc overed that their travel vocation was non only unprofitable however facing signifi asst losses. Something had to be done and in face of stiff competition, any strategy devised needed to be implemented as soon as possible. Executives saw that the task save was too complicated and extensive to be handled by Thomas Cook alone. This is where Accenture comes in.Accenture is primarily a research organization. With extensive experience in practically every industry, Accenture has depart a brand many self-coloureds feel lofty to be associated with. As per its website, Accenture is a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company with net revenues of US$16.65 billion for the fiscal year ended Aug. 31, 2006. Accenture has been expanding its offerings and capitalizing on evolving management trends and technologies. Its main(prenominal) services revolve round systems integration and business integration and deployment of enterprise resource planning, customer relationship management and electronic services. indeed Accenture over the years has established itself as a leader in todays global marketplace.Thomas Cook was thus in an urgent need of not only a solution but overly an happy implementer of the solution which they found in Accenture. Accenture with its extensive experience in the IT and travel industry along with cutting edge research became the perfect choice for Thomas Cook and resulted in a profitable rendership for two.AnalysisThomas Cook, instead of outsourcing its IT and business requirements to Accenture completely diversenessed a partnership. A partnership is more than just a contract. On the busin ess to business transaction continuum, transactions be the simplest form of exchange between two businesses. Contracts define a specific sequence period of a service or result being provided with specific fees.An outsourcing is more of a contract than a partnership with the provider firm charging for services over a period of time. In a partnership however, interest of two parties are at stake and this is exactly what is happening here. Accenture not only shares in Thomas Cooks mesh but also puts itself at a risk of losing money. Thus a co sourcing agreement differs from a normal outsourcing one in this way that both parties mutually proceed to come through specific goals rather than one being the service receiver and the other charging for it.The forward- face uping system at Thomas Cook was enabled and setup completely by Accenture. A turnaround strategy was implemented over a period of time to do so. We go out now analyze the new system employ two popular systems of ana lysis namely SWOT and Porters Five Forces put.SWOT Analysis of Thomas CookStrengths Thomas Cook is a widely know and accepted brand worldwide and a large organization with a widespread network of travel agents resulting in a wide reach. Along with this, it has over the years developed 10 tourism brands. These brands should be treated as assets and nurtured further to gain profits. Its large customer base too contributes to its success and has been the main reason behind its long sustainability. Accenture too itself is a respected brand and a global leader in the field of change management and outsourcing facilities. Since a partnership benefits both arties, Thomas Cook has benefited a lot from not only Accentures expertise but also due to their status in the research and IT industry.Weaknesses The sheer size of the firm raise be seen by about as a weakness. The number of staff too is too blue and Thomas Cook could look into this matter and find that they probably need downsizin g as well. Thomas Cook doesnt seem to have nonrecreational enough attention to brand management. These brands should be treated as assets rather than just the name of a service they provide and by doing so they allow for realize higher(prenominal) brand equity resulting in customer loyalty and lifetime value.Opportunities Thomas Cook had a major opportunity when it decided to relocation over to a completely IT enable business model and they grasped it. Further opportunities may include the option to bring all their systems online rather than just consolidation them. Furthermore, other departments can be also be integrated within the current system resulting in a more IT oriented business model. Having an IT cornerstone also gives rise to opportunities such as partnering with other firms in the industry and linking with travel agents as well.Threats major curses at this stage would be other firms emulating Thomas Cook or coming up with a more sophisticated and agile business mo del. Nowadays, market responsiveness is a major determining cipher in a firms failure or success. More adaptive firms can give Thomas Cook a hard time in the market arena. Moreover, any firm realizing the above evidenced opportunities and seizing them before Thomas Cook can prove as major threat to Thomas Cook as well. Other brands existing in the market can also be seen as threats.These results can be used by Thomas Cook as inputs to the creative generation of possible strategies, by asking and answering the following four straitssHow to Use each Strength?How to give the axe each Weakness?How to Exploit each Opportunity?How to Defend against each Threat?Thomas Cook according to Porters Five Forces modelThe Five Forces model developed by Porter can be used to analyze the current industry and its effects on Thomas Cook.Existing Competition Thomas Cook should look at the existing competition within its industry (and indirect competition as well). By doing so, they should realize w here they stand in foothold of the industry standard and how they can increase this gap between themselves and the competition. This would result in higher profits and greater lead time. Competition will also not be able to cherry pick Thomas Cooks customers and lag behind them.Threat of Substitutes a major threat to a firm in any given industry is when the competition starts emulating and selling its products. This results in customers transferring to the other offerings (depending on their propensity to transfer). Thomas Cook here has the edge due to the brands it owns. Brands moorage themselves uniquely in the minds of the customers and thus increase their loyalty whilst decreasing the chances of transferring to another product. Thomas Cook should devise a marketing strategy centered around promoting not only its brands but also its corporate image. IT systems in this regard can be used by implementing a CRM (Customer Relationship Management) system to asses consumer needs. Thi s will not only cater their needs but also set the bar higher for competition.Threat of New Entrants Thomas Cook, by partnering with Accenture and deploying a state of the IT system has already set high standards in the industry. This has resulted in barriers to entry for new firms. Each new firm entering will have to think of twice due to the high investment required now to set up an IT infrastructure and then operate within the industry. They should however be evocative of entrants with strong financial backing who would be willing to invest more than Thomas Cook already has. Such entrants can be further deterred by setting up more barriers by enhancing the IT infrastructure even more. Moreover, Thomas Cook can become the leader and by doing so set newer and higher standards which will be hard to achieve not only for new entrants but current competitors as well.Bargaining Power ofSupplier Since being in the travel industry, Thomas Cooks main suppliers are airlines and the raw ma terials which go into operating them. Petroleum prices have risen considerably and thus suppliers of petroleum have a high negotiate power. Along with this, suppliers of airplane maintenance products too enjoy a strong bargaining power as their products are highly narrow and industry specific. One factor however has been the decline in air travel which could have resulted in a decrease in supplier bargaining power.Buyer Consumers are well aware nowadays of the various services offered to them by the various firm in the industry. Consumers nowadays have many choices, customization options, still offerings etc. to lure them and garner their loyalties. This makes it harder to deal with. Furthermore, their fickle demands require a firm to be very agile in order to fulfill them. This has resulted in an increase in the customers buying power. No wonder the whole economy is moving towards a customer oriented approach rather than the old product oriented approach that existed a few decad es ago. Thomas cook thus should be mindful of this and reach to keep its customers from transferring to other service providers via newer and better offerings.Thomas Cooks IT solution is not unique when it comes to the actual technology implemented. The uniqueness lies in the fact that they were able to not only implement a system in such a short time (considering the sheer size of the firm) but also the fact that they realized huge cost reductions and profits within a short period of time. In IT systems of such caliber, the major issues pertain to the actual transition phase and gatting existing employees to accept the changes. Thomas Cook not only successfully implemented in the wake of the 9/11 catastrophe but managed to make a smooth transition from a disparate, loss prone organization to a smooth running, integrated one with higher returns.Co-sourcing and OutsourcingIn the Thomas Cook case, not only was a new system implemented but a whole organizational culture was turned arou nd. This could not have been possible without the key input of an expert firm in this regard like Accenture. Thomas Cook realized this in the very beginning and went ahead with the decision to co source the strategy with Accenture. The question here arises as to why co sourcing rather than the conventional outsourcing?Outsourcing, as the name suggest, technically means to allot ones non-core business function(s) to an external organization which is an expert in that field. Example could include the various U.S. firms outsourcing IT services to firms in India who have the skill set and expertise to develop software solutions. The need to outsource can arise due to various factors. The most open-and-shut reason to outsource is usually a step towards cost cutting and shedding off uncalled-for responsibilities thus enabling a firm to concentrate on its core competencies. Apart from this, outsourcing to other countries (off shoring) is seen as a major cost cutting method due to the che ap labor available than ones own country.Cosorucing in the Thomas Cook case is more of a partnering strategy than an outsourcing one. In this, two or more firms decide to get together and work towards a common goal, with both benefiting form the others expertise. Unlike a partnership however, the scope is usually different. In a full fledged partnership, employees from both firms get together as teams (strategic alliance) and add their expertise to develop products and services to maximize profits or to become industry leaders.In a co sourcing alliance, a number of employees only (Accenture employees) get together with the other firms employees (Thomas Cook) to assist them in non core activities. Unlike outsourcing where both firms are separated and work independently from one another, co sourcing allows sets of employees from both firms to work together to achieve organizational objectives.Both methods have their own pros and cons. Outsourcing is shortly the hype and the best strat egy to cut down costs. Doing so enables a firm to keep its costs low and concentrate on its core activities. Opponents of these strategies however state that product quality drops due to lack of standardization of labor employed and security issues can also arise due to transfer of slight data.In co sourcing, one does not see these disadvantages. The reason being that both firms share from the firms overall success and thus both equally strive to develop improved products and services. The main problem with co sourcing however is the sharing of sensitive data which if revealed to competitors can spell disaster to a firm. Apart from this, partnering firms can have different ideas as to the direction where the business should go towards.Employees can also pose a major problem here especially if they are not willing t accept the changes and see the other firm as outsiders. In the end, it is matter of trust and cohesion and this can only be achieved if both firms clearly lay down the g orudn rules and work towards their respective incentives with one playing the role of the leader and the other the facilitator (as Thomas Cook is being facilitated but not lead by Accenture).Alternative StrategiesThe current strategy seems to work pretty well for Thomas Cook. They could have however spent a elflike more time and devised a better strategy. Some suggestions areRe-engineering is a good way to asses current business processes and improve them by setting up better and more efficient ones. Since a change management strategy was used, Thomas Cook could also have taken a good look at current business processes and implemented new ones. In the current strategy, a new IT system has just been implemented over the current practices. descend of employees and the ratio with the HR personnel should be maintained. Industry standards should be researched and then Thomas Cook can adjust accordingly.Current employees can also be trained and not all should be entrusted to another firm . Transfer of familiarity over the years could have also resulted in current employees gaining enough knowledge to run the system themselves.Although Thomas Cook has co sourced with Accenture, in the long run an outsourcing strategy would have proven more profitable. Since Accenture is now a partner and sharing in profits rather than working at a certain fees, it makes sense to valuate and reevaluate whether outsourcing would be more profitable or the current strategy is still better.Thomas Cook implemented this strategy at its headquarters so far. It should also be keen on implementing in other locations and integrate them as one whole.Opportunities and Risks of VirtualizationVirtualization reveals many opportunities for a firm. It not only affects the internal environment of a firm but also has durable effects on the external environment. Increase in profitability, efficiency and improved service to customers are all seen in most of the projects implemented. There are some risk s however which have to be assessedHigh risk of failure associated with projects of such magnitude.Employee acceptance.Cost effectiveness.Proper usage of the system consolidation and proper maintenance of system.sustentation of backups.Change of requirements and expansion of system.Handling affects on internal and external environment.Thomas Cook will need to conduct a context analysis to assess the real scope of changes the system has and will cause in the future. In doing so, not only will they able to fully asses the risks associated but also the obvious benefits such as realization of profits, efficiency, cost cutting and hidden benefits such as competitive advantage, customer relationships and deterrent to new entrants.Pervious analysis has already revealed the advantages of this system and strengths of Thomas Cook. What now needs to be done is eliminate the threats and overcome weaknesses along with enhancing the strengths and translating them into larger profits.ReferencesAcc enture, retrieved 10 January 2007, http//www.accenture.com/home/default.htm?viewType=FlashBEA Systems Inc., 2005. Turning IT mental imagery Into Business Value, retrieved 10 January 2007, http//www.bea.com/content/news_events/white_papers/BEA_Vision_Reality.pdfBusiness Integration Journal, Integration Appliances Deliver Application IntegrationProjects in Days, retrieved 10 January 2007,http//www.bijonline.com/redir.cfm? showcase=whitepaperid=7Business Integration Journal, Web Integration Technical Whitepaper retrieved 10 January 2007, http//www.bijonline.com/redir.cfm?type=whitepaperid=10Business Integration Journal, Why Application Automation Should Be Part of IT Infrastructure, retrieved 10 January 2007, http//www.bijonline.com/redir.cfm?type=whitepaperid=12Business Process Co-sourcing Imperative, Historically Inevitable, Ready to Go. 2004, retrieved 10 January 2007, http//www.peterkeen.com/recent/articles/cosourci.htm earnings Management Co-sourcing A new way to achieve Strategi c earnings Success 200, retrieved 10 January 2007, http//www.mercerhr.com/compensationcosourcingContext Analysis, retrieved 10 January 2007, http//changingminds.org/disciplines/change_management/diagnosing_change/context_analysis.htmCo-sourcing vs Outsourcing No Substantive Difference 2003 retrieved 10 January 2007, http//www.ciol.com/content/search/showarticle1.asp?artid=44524ICMBA Inc., 2004. SWOT Analysis, retrieved 10 January 2007, http//www.quickmba.com/strategy/swotCompensation Management Co-sourcing A new way to achieve Strategic Compensation Success 200, retrieved 10 January 2007, http//www.mercerhr.com/compensationcosourcingContext Analysis, retrieved 10 January 2007, http//changingminds.org/disciplines/change_management/diagnosing_change/context_analysis.htmCo-sourcing vs Outsourcing No Substantive Difference 2003 retrieved 10 January 2007,http//www.ciol.com/content/search/showarticle1.asp?artid=44524Fabio Casati, Angela Discenza. Modeling and Managing Interactions among BusinessProcesses.Journal of Systems Integration, Volume 10, Number 1, April 2001.Hoon Seong Leem, Bumyong Oh. Evaluating Information Strategic Planning An Evaluation System and Its Application, 2001, Journal of Systems Integration, Volume 10, Number 3, July 2001. marketing Teacher, Five Forces Analysis retrieved 10 January 2007, http//marketingteacher.com/Lessons/lesson_fivefoces.htmMarketing Teacher, SWOT Analysis Lesson. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunites and Threats (SWOT), retrieved 10 January 2007, http//marketingteacher.com/Lessons/lesson_swot.htmUsability Context Analysis, retrieved 10 January 2007, http//www.ucc.ie/hfrg/projects/respect/urmethods/usability.htm